1) Should oral Bisphosphanates be preferred over intravenous ?
2) Will Bisphosphonates be sufficient in this case, or are Teriparatides needed ? Teriparatide injections in India are quite expensive and monthly treatments for a year will double her monthly spending.
3) A second opinion was taken from a family doctor and he suggested taking Teriparatide injections alone. Does that not seem wrong - since parathyriod hormone will also increase resorption if calcium is deficient in the body ?
Medications themselves can be classified as antiresorptive or bone anabolic agents. Teriparatide (Forteo) is also approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women who have severe osteoporosis and are considered at high risk for fractures. The medicine is given through daily shots underneath the skin and you can give these shots even at home. Another advantage is that it can be given in patients who cannot tolerate oral biphosphonate drugs.
Doctor send my blood to test more. Now eia hiv 1/2 (rdna) come out negative. So I go to one hospital and another clinic which they test me qith 4 gen combo test called abbott architect. Both tests come out negative. 5 1/2 month aprt from exposure I get wb 1/2 which come out negative while waiting for wb rrsult they test me with the 2 same rapid tests which they still come out positive. I have test hiv rna pcr at 6 month negative. Repeating hiv1 2 rdna negarice at 6 month.
I need to know about HIV1/HIV2 rDNA EIA test by Abbott laboratory, 1.is this an antibody test? 2.how accurate is this test? 3.what's the window period for this test? ***I'v tested for HIV with this test after 49 days from my possible exposure.
t sure what test to run they run RNA ultra sensitive, rDNA and PCR Quantative and antibody, ultra sensitive results *=out of range, rDNA <75, and PCR quantative <50, wich is good, undetectable levels, now my main question is the antibody test was ran again and the result it was non react, which my understanding still NEGATIVE for antibodies after two years of infection, do you believe that the fist set of test there were false positive and now these new test are false Negative or what'
All came back negative, and he tested me hiv1/hiv2 rDNA EIA by Abbott lab,it came back negative, but he tested me 2 weeks after my possible exposure,
After a month from my possible exposure I decided to test again so I went to a clinic and get tested for HIV 1/0/2 icma by labcorp it came back negative, so my first test was 2 weeks after and the second test was a month after posiible exposure, how accurate are these tests after 2 weeks and after one month??
All came back negative, and he tested me hiv1/hiv2 rDNA EIA by Abbott lab,it came back negative, but he tested me 2 weeks after my possible exposure, After a month from my possible exposure I decided to test again so I went to a clinic and get tested for HIV 1/0/2 icma by labcorp it came back negative, so my first test was 2 weeks after and the second test was a month after posiible exposure, how accurate are these tests after 2 weeks and after one month??
I haven't yet found reason for my symptoms. I have negative HIV antibody test result at 16 weeks mark and still have palpable lymph nodes in my neck,under jaw and in my groins. I had a rash on my forehead after exposure and my girlfriend has the same rash now. She also has persistent headaches and stomach aches. I am so scared especially when I see cases like this from the Body:
False positive or false negative?
All came back negative, and he tested me hiv1/hiv2 rDNA EIA by Abbott lab,it came back negative, but he tested me 2 weeks after my possible exposure,
After a month from my possible exposure I decided to test again so I went to a clinic and get tested for HIV 1/0/2 icma by labcorp it came back negative, so my first test was 2 weeks after and the second test was a month after posiible exposure, how accurate are these tests after 2 weeks and after one month??
There is no such disease in my family,neither from my parents nor grand parents.I would like to know the origin of this disease.I would like to know of any existing test that will be able to reveal its origin.Thank you very much.
It showed fetal origin of the posterior cerebral arteries bilaterally from the carotid circulation. It also said the basilar artery is small and appears to give rise to both superior cerebellar arteries. What does this mean?
If we are strictly talking about lung cancer, the differentiation is based on whether the cancer has small cell features. The origin is not really important in determining treatment options, and hence, there is no routine testing done to perform this function of differentiation. Stay positive.
Recommended
